Australian Aquatic Biological

Australian aquatic biodiversity research and consultancy

Bifenthrin pesticide causes catastrophic crayfish mass mortality event in Blue Mountains NSW

Juvenile Euastacus spinifer Jamison Creek NSW

Juvenile Euastacus spinifer Jamison Creek NSW

Bifenthrin is a pyrethroid insecticide typically applied by pest controllers to protect against termites. It has a high toxicity to aquatic organisms. In July 2012 bifenthrin contaminated Jamison Creek, Wentworth Falls, NSW and caused a mass mortality event of freshwater crayfish and macroinvertebrates. As part of the Australian Crayfish Project we volunteered to conduct a follow up survey of Jamison Creek and similar creeks in the area to monitor the recovery of freshwater crayfish and fish in the creek after this catastrophic event.

Jamison Creek, Wentworth Falls, NSW

Jamison Creek, Wentworth Falls, NSW

Results of those surveys were included in a scientific paper which has been presented at 7th Australian Stream Management Conference held in July at Townsville, Queensland.

The Giant Spiny Crayfish Euastacus spinifer from Jamison Creek

The Giant Spiny Crayfish Euastacus spinifer from Jamison Creek

St Lawrence, A., Wright, I.A., McCormack, R.B., Day, C., Smith, G. and Crane, B. (2014). Bifenthrin pesticide contamination: impacts and recovery at Jamison Creek, Wentworth Falls, in Vietz, G; Rutherfurd, I.D, and Hughes, R. (editors), Proceedings of the 7th Australian Stream Management Conference. Townsville, Queensland, Pages 558-567.

Abstract

In July 2012, over 1000 dead Giant Spiny Crayfish (Euastacus spinifer) were found in a two kilometre reach of Jamison Creek, Wentworth Falls, including within the Greater Blue Mountains World Heritage Area. A multi-agency investigation discovered the crayfish were killed by a termiticide, Bifenthrin, and that the effects extended beyond the crayfish to the entire aquatic macroinvertebrate community. The contaminant entered the creek via a conventional stormwater drainage system of pits and pipes, which provided a direct connection between the property at which the pesticide was over-applied and the creek 300m away. The pest control operators involved were prosecuted.

Our paper is now available on the conference website:

http://7asm-2014.m.asnevents.com.au/information#/schedule/abstract/11636

 

 

Research & Aquaculture Director for Australian Aquatic Biological P/L
Team Leader for The Australian Crayfish Project
Director of Mid West Yabby & Fish Traders and RBM Aquaculture
Secretary of NSW Aquaculture Assoc Inc
Research Associate for Carnegie Museum of Natural History
Honorary Research Fellow, Queensland Museum

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

3 Comments

  1. Maureen CoffeyOctober 6, 2014 at 5:21 amReply

    It has been long known that pyrethroids are very toxic for most aquatic organisms. Often we’re told that they are decomposed by the time they reach ground water or rivers. However, with each new development, stability seems to increase and with it potential pollution of waterways.Since pyrethroids are nothing but variations of natural substances from plants that most likely stood near rivers for millennia and never caused poisoning, Industry has to develop means of application that mimic that sort of containment or risk bans on these substances like happened to DDT.

  2. Mahri KochApril 5, 2015 at 10:42 amReply

    Robert, I need to identify a crayfish I found at my back door this morning – have photo – Glen Elgin valley, southern boundary of Butterleaf NP, NSW – possibly juvenile Euastacus spinifer ??? I can email photo to you. Thank you in anticipation!

    • Robert McCormackApril 5, 2015 at 11:14 amReply

      Hi Mahri,
      please send a photo and Ill do my best to identify,
      Cheers
      Rob

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

sixteen − five =